Skip to main content
HomeBenefitsPIPThe Reliability Test

The PIP Reliability Test: Why 'Can You Do It?' Is Not the Real Question

Data last checked on .

By law, the DWP cannot simply ask whether you can do an activity. It must ask whether you can do it reliably, that is, safely, to an acceptable standard, as often as you need to, and in a reasonable time. A descriptor only applies to you if you can do what it describes in all four of those ways, so a task you can only manage unsafely, badly, once, or very slowly does not count as one you can do.

Key points
  • By law (regulation 4 of the PIP Regulations 2013) a task only counts if you can do it reliably.
  • Reliably means all four of: safely, to an acceptable standard, repeatedly, and in a reasonable time.
  • Fail any one of the four and the descriptor saying you can do it should not apply.
  • 'Reasonable time' is defined as no more than twice as long as someone without your condition.
  • Answer every PIP activity through the reliability test, and describe the after-effects ('payback').

What the reliability test is

When the DWP scores a PIP claim, it works through 12 activities and, for each one, chooses the description (the “descriptor”) that best fits you. Regulation 4(2A) of the Social Security (PIP) Regulations 2013 says a descriptor can only be treated as applying to you if you can carry out the activity:

  • Yes: Safely
  • Yes: To an acceptable standard
  • Yes: Repeatedly
  • Yes: Within a reasonable time period

In other words, the question is never just “can you do it?” It is “can you do it reliably, every time you need to, the way it actually needs to be done?” If the honest answer is no, that descriptor does not apply and a different descriptor has to be found.

Challenging a decision? Keep your case in order

Keep your deadline, your evidence and every call and letter together in the free Claim Companion workspace. Log your good and bad days as they happen, so your record is ready when you need it.

Open free workspace →

The four parts, with what each one means

Three of the four terms are given a precise meaning in regulation 4(4). The fourth, “to an acceptable standard”, is not defined in law, so it carries its ordinary meaning: the task is done properly, not half-finished.

1. Safely

The law defines this as doing the activity “in a manner unlikely to cause harm to you or to another person, either during or after completion”. The risk does not have to be certain, just a real possibility of harm. Example: if you have blackouts or seizures, bathing or cooking on the hob is not done safely, even on the days nothing goes wrong.

2. To an acceptable standard

The activity has to be completed to a reasonable standard, not just attempted. Example: if your condition means you can wash but regularly miss areas, or you cook but leave food undercooked, the task is not being done to an acceptable standard.

3. Repeatedly

Defined as being able to do the activity “as often as the activity is reasonably required to be completed”. One success is not enough if you need to do something several times a day. Example: you might climb the stairs once in the morning, but if pain or fatigue then stops you going up and down as the day needs, you cannot do it repeatedly.

4. Within a reasonable time period

Defined as taking “no more than twice as long as the maximum a person without the condition would normally take”. Example: if getting washed and dressed takes most people ten minutes but takes you forty, you are not completing it in a reasonable time.

Why one failure is enough

This is the part that is easy to miss. You do not have to fail all four. If you cannot do an activity safely, it does not matter that you could do it quickly and properly, you still cannot do it reliably. The same goes for each of the other three. Failing any one means the descriptor does not apply, and the assessor must look for the descriptor that does.

The classic mistake is answering “I can cook a meal.” Technically true, but it loses you points. The reliable answer is: “I can cook a simple meal once, but I have to sit down halfway through, I have burned myself reaching across the hob, and afterwards the pain means I can't do anything else for the rest of the day.” That answer engages safety, repetition and after-effects, and it scores.

How to use the reliability test in your claim

Whether you are filling in the PIP2 form, sitting a health assessment, or writing a Mandatory Reconsideration, run every activity through the same four questions:

  • Yes: Can I do this safely, with no real risk of harm during or afterwards?
  • Yes: Can I do it to a proper standard, not half-done?
  • Yes: Can I do it as often as I actually need to through the day?
  • Yes: Can I do it without taking far longer than someone without my condition?

For any activity where the answer is no, say so plainly, give a real example, and describe the after-effects (the “payback”) and how often the problem happens. This last point links to the 50% rule for fluctuating conditions, a difficulty counts if it affects you on more than half your days.

Not sure which activities your condition affects, or how many points each answer scores? Use our PIP points and descriptors guide and the PIP points calculator.

If the assessor ignored reliability

Assessors are required to apply the reliability test, but a report can skip it, recording that you “can” do something without checking whether you can do it safely, repeatedly, properly and in a reasonable time. If your assessment report or decision did this, it is a strong ground of challenge.

Get a copy of your assessment report and read it against this test, then see our guide on how to challenge a PIP assessment report and the PIP appeal process. PIP in Northern Ireland has the same reliability rule. Adult Disability Payment in Scotland uses the same four words but defines them more fully: “safely” takes account of how likely harm is and how serious it would be, and “to an acceptable standard” takes account of the impact on you of doing the activity to that standard.

Keep track of your case

The guides on this site are free and always will be. If your problem will take weeks or months, the Claim Companion is a free workspace to keep your deadline, your evidence and every call and letter together.

A case that runs on

Claim Companion

Freeno payment and no card

For something that will take weeks or months: a benefits claim or appeal, an eviction, a dispute at work. A free workspace that keeps your deadline, your evidence and every call and letter in one place.

  • Your deadline, counted down
  • A dated log of your evidence, calls and letters
  • Your case stages, notes and calendar together
Open my free workspace →

We are not a law firm and this is not legal advice.

Frequently asked questions

What is the PIP reliability test?

It is a legal rule (regulation 4 of the PIP Regulations 2013) that says a PIP activity only counts as something you 'can' do if you can do it reliably: safely, to an acceptable standard, repeatedly, and within a reasonable time. If you cannot meet any one of those four, a descriptor saying you can do that activity should not apply.

What does 'reliably' mean for PIP?

Reliably means all four of the following at once: safely (no real risk of harm to you or others during or after), to an acceptable standard (done properly, not half-finished), repeatedly (as often as you need to through the day), and in a reasonable time (no more than twice as long as someone without your condition). Failing any single one is enough.

What counts as a 'reasonable time' for PIP?

The regulations define it as no more than twice as long as the maximum time a person without your condition would normally take to complete the activity. So if a task takes a person without your condition at most ten minutes and it takes you more than twenty, you are not doing it in a reasonable time.

Do I have to fail all four parts of the reliability test?

No. You only need to fail one. If you cannot do an activity safely, it does not matter that you could do it quickly and to a good standard, you still cannot do it reliably, and a different descriptor should apply.

Does the reliability test apply in Scotland and Northern Ireland?

Yes, with a difference in Scotland. PIP in Northern Ireland (run by the Department for Communities) has the same rule. Adult Disability Payment in Scotland also requires an activity to be done safely, to an acceptable standard, repeatedly and within a reasonable time, but its regulations define 'safely' and 'to an acceptable standard' more fully, taking account of how likely and how serious any harm would be.

Related guides

PIP Points and Descriptors
Every activity and how many points each descriptor scores.
Fluctuating Conditions and the 50% Rule
How PIP counts difficulties that change from day to day.
How to Fill in the PIP2 Form
Apply the reliability test to every activity on the claim form.
Challenge Your Assessment Report
What to do when the report ignored how you really manage.
PIP Points Calculator
Estimate your score before you send the form.

Found this useful? Link to it

If you run a site, write an article, or help others with their rights, please link to this guide, it helps more people find free, reliable guidance.

https://www.knowyourrightsuk.com/benefits/pip/reliability-test
Know Your Rights UK. "The PIP Reliability Test: Why 'Can You Do It?' Is Not the Real Question." Know Your Rights UK, https://www.knowyourrightsuk.com/benefits/pip/reliability-test